top of page

CHARITY NAVIGATOR

Nov 22, 2019
3 min read

Updated: Jan 18, 2025



Donating money to an organization is not something that most people take lightly. We work hard for our earnings and when we donate, we want those donations to actually benefit the cause we are supporting. With the plethora of nonprofit organizations out there, sometimes it can be daunting to figure out which organization will best use the donation. Does the nonprofit fit within my values? Are they transparent? Is my money going to the programs, to pay the salary of an employee, or to help support a new location? Does the organization use my donation efficiently? Finding answers to these questions can sometimes be difficult—that is where Charity Navigator comes into play. Since its inception in 2001, Charity Navigator has aimed to provide an unbiased evaluation of 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations in order to help donors make more educated decisions when making contributions. Charity Navigator is a website that compiles information pertaining to nonprofit organizations’ financial activities, practices, purposes, and programs, and translates this information into a numerical score. The score demonstrates how efficiently a charity is likely to use a donor’s gift – and Charity Navigator’s ratings tell donors how well the organization has sustained its programs and services over time and their level of commitment to good governance, best practices, and openness with information.


To determine the numerical score of an organization, Charity Navigator focuses its analysis into two categories: (1) the financial health of the organization; and (2) the transparency and accountability of the organization. Within these categories, Charity Navigator uses criteria such revenue, length of operations, location, public support, fundraising expenses, and administrative expenses, excluding land trusts, hospitals (and related foundations), colleges, donor advised funds, fiscal sponsors, and sorority and fraternity foundations to evaluate nonprofits. For more information on how an organization’s score is calculated, click here.


If your organization wants to raise its Charity Navigator rating, it can focus on either of the two categories. With respect to the financial health rating, the charity can raise its score by: (1) increasing the percentage of total expenses that are spent on related programs and services; and (2) improving its working capital ratio (a measure of working capital divided by total expenses). With respect to the transparency and accountability ratio, the charity can raise its score by making more organizational information (such as company policies, salaries of executives, or board meeting minutes) available to the public, or to involve an independent governing body in the organization.


For example, the Make-A-Wish Foundation of Minnesota (MAW) has an overall score of 75.80/100 earning it 2 out of 4 stars on Charity Navigator. MAW has 97.00/100 and 4 stars for its accountability and transparency, but a 65.91/100 and 1 star for its financial rating. In contrast, the nonprofit Community Volunteers in Medicine (CVM) has earned a perfect score of 100 and 4 stars in both categories. Comparing some of their key financial numbers, we can see that CVM uses a higher percentage of its expenses for the programs and services it delivers than MAW does, 90.8% compared to 70.7%. MAW uses nearly 20% of its total expenses on fundraising, compared to CVM spending less than 5%. If MAW lowered the amount of money it spent on administration and fundraising, raising the proportion of expenses used for the programs and services it provides, it could raise its financial score. CVM also uses 2.77% of its total expenses for leadership compensation, compared to 5.3% for MAW. If MAW lowered this amount, it would help to increase its financial score, which in turn would raise its overall score and rating.

 
 
 

250 Comments


georgelewis65040
44 minutes ago

Bài về cách bảng xếp hạng các tổ chức từ thiện tôi đọc hơi chậm vì toàn những chỉ số, sau vài lần đọc mới hiểu bức tranh tổng thể nằm ở đâu. Việc đo bằng tỷ lệ chi phí quản lý trên tổng chi phí thì nghe hợp lý, còn những chỗ khác tác giả nói chưa chắc ai làm được thì tôi cũng chưa có ý kiến gì. Trong gia đình tôi có người từng quyên góp cho một vài quỹ, nên câu hỏi tiền đi đâu thực tế không phải lúc nào cũng rõ. Có một dòng nói bảng xếp hạng chỉ là điểm khởi đầu cho người đọc tự cân nhắc, tôi đồng ý. Lúc mình…

Like

davidrobinson83132
16 hours ago

A conversation about choosing learning resources for different needs seems most useful to me when it leaves space for uncertainty and further questions. The same explanation can feel clear to one learner and confusing to another. That is the kind of detail I would keep in mind while exploring educational learning resources. I am more curious about the process than a polished result, because the steps in between are usually where questions appear. What clues help you choose a resource that matches a learner's starting point?

Like

susanmartin42769
18 hours ago

I can see why connecting values with everyday school life would invite discussion, since different people will bring different experiences to the same question. Kindness becomes easier to understand when it appears in ordinary classroom situations. It makes me curious about the practical side of values based education. I can imagine different answers depending on the situation, so I would want to understand the context before drawing conclusions. How can a school discuss values while leaving room for students' questions?

Like

matthewcarter403
19 hours ago

The subject of creating a welcoming preschool environment feels more interesting when there is room for a reader to stop and ask their own questions. A predictable daily rhythm can make an unfamiliar classroom feel more comfortable. I would use that point as a starting question when considering welcoming preschool environment. I am still thinking through the details, and a small example would help me picture how this works in practice. Which small classroom details help a new child settle in?

Like

williamjohnson9532
21 hours ago

My first thought about making room for neighbourhood learning activities is that the everyday experience deserves as much attention as the larger explanation. A familiar local meeting place can make trying a new activity feel more approachable. For me, that is a useful way into the broader subject of community learning activities. A short discussion of an everyday example would make this easier for me to connect with, especially as someone still learning about the subject. What would encourage someone to join a class for the first time?

Like
bottom of page